What’s in Northwestern University’s deal with the Trump administration?

What’s in Northwestern University’s deal with the Trump administration?

This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

Northwestern University on Friday agreed to pay $75 million to the Trump administration over three years and make policy changes in exchange for regaining access to roughly $790 million in federal research funding. 

The Chicago-area university also agreed to provide the federal government with detailed admissions data, end diversity statements in hiring, and ask international applicants why they’re seeking to study in the U.S, among other requirements. And the university canceled an agreement struck with pro-Palestinian protesters last year to end their five-day encampment on campus. 

Interim Northwestern President Henry Bienen cast the agreement with the Trump administration as necessary to restore the private university’s federal research funding and avoid costly litigation. But critics accused the university of bowing down to government overreach. 

With the pact, Northwestern becomes the sixth institution to publicly enter a deal with the Trump administration to have its federal research funding restored. The deal also closed three federal agencies’ investigations into the university. 

Northwestern has been financially reeling since April, when the Trump administration froze vast sums of federal research funding over claims that the university hadn’t done enough to protect Jewish students from antisemitism. Shortly after the grants were frozen, Northwestern said it would self-fund the research

Over the past seven months, that’s translated into about $40 million each month, Bienen said in a video message Friday. 

“If our frozen federal research funding had continued, it [threatened] to gut our labs, drive away faculty and set back entire fields of discovery,” Bienen said. “Litigation would likely have taken years to work its way through the legal system.”

Columbia University, Brown University, Cornell University, the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Virginia have also struck deals with the Trump administration, with some along similar terms as Northwestern’s. 

Harvard University, on the other hand, sued the Trump administration over roughly $2.2 billion in frozen research funding. A federal judge handed the Ivy League university a victory in September, ruling the Trump administration violated the university’s constitutional rights and didn’t follow proper steps when it froze the funding. 

 

Did Northwestern get ‘essentially blackmailed’?

Democratic officials at both local and federal levels criticized the agreement this week. 

The Trump administration “essentially blackmailed” the university into “bending to its will,” said Daniel Biss, mayor of Evanston, Illinois, where Northwestern’s main campus is located, in a Monday statement.

“I am alarmed that the Trump administration is apparently finding success in its continued campaign to undermine the principles of freedom of speech and academic freedom that make our very democracy function,” said Biss, who is running to represent Northwestern’s congressional district in the House. 

Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen, a Democrat and outspoken critic of the Trump administration, slammed Northwestern for striking the deal. 

We must keep calling out those that cave to the Trump Admin, and the latest is Northwestern,” he said in a social media post Monday. Van Hollen specifically criticized the university for reneging on the deal it struck with pro-Palestinian protesters. 

“Throwing your students under the bus to please Trump. Shameful,” he added.

Andrew Gillen, an education research fellow at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, said that while the agreement is better than the other deals the Trump administration has struck with colleges, it suffers from a “fundamental flaw.” 

The main problem with the settlement is that the university was punished via the withholding of previously awarded research funding before it was proven to be guilty,” Gillen said. “But real justice requires proof of guilt before a punishment is imposed.”

U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi, however, heaped praise on the deal.

Source link

Related Articles